<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saw VI Review?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review</link>
	<description>Horror Movie News, Reviews, Original Articles and Interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:18:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tastycorpse</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-121887</link>
		<dc:creator>Tastycorpse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-121887</guid>
		<description>2 months late on reading this, but, awful review, buddy. While many of us know that the Saw series has been driven to the ground, and they should have kept it at 2 sequels, OR at least waited a few years between them, I can say bad things about every other sequel ever made and still make it stick. Just add moronic overviews about things I don&#039;t know and pretend that I saw the movie, making a review based on other reviews or plot line. Also, based on your other stuff, I see you hated every other movie under the sun.

A little advice: Either leave your brain at the door when you go see a movie, sit back and relax, or read a book. I recommend Chuck Palahniuk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 months late on reading this, but, awful review, buddy. While many of us know that the Saw series has been driven to the ground, and they should have kept it at 2 sequels, OR at least waited a few years between them, I can say bad things about every other sequel ever made and still make it stick. Just add moronic overviews about things I don&#8217;t know and pretend that I saw the movie, making a review based on other reviews or plot line. Also, based on your other stuff, I see you hated every other movie under the sun.</p>
<p>A little advice: Either leave your brain at the door when you go see a movie, sit back and relax, or read a book. I recommend Chuck Palahniuk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nards23</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-118073</link>
		<dc:creator>nards23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-118073</guid>
		<description>i am pretty surprised at how much people disagree with this review.  it&#039;s surprising to me that anyone seriously thinks the Saw movies are still good, and i stopped watching after Saw II.  i suppose out of curiosity i&#039;ll go check out the other four.

anyway, i enjoyed the review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am pretty surprised at how much people disagree with this review.  it&#8217;s surprising to me that anyone seriously thinks the Saw movies are still good, and i stopped watching after Saw II.  i suppose out of curiosity i&#8217;ll go check out the other four.</p>
<p>anyway, i enjoyed the review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasha</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117971</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117971</guid>
		<description>Wow... some of you guys need to find a grip and grab hold.

The Saw series undoubtedly turned into a train-wreck past the third one, and anyone with any thinking power would see that.  The fact that they were running out of ideas has been quite prevalent with all the back-pedalling and scooping up past characters, and it&#039;s been like breathing air into lungs that had been sitting in formaldehyde for a few decades.  Not to mention all the hands in the pot, plus the very short time frames to write, shoot, edit and distribute, a successful film was beyond miraculous.

And yet, as much as we all have groaned after watching 4, we found ourselves coming back to 5, and more than likely 6.  If those of you criticizing the writer here would take a deep look inside yourselves, you&#039;d probably agree and kick yourselves in the ass.

I personally acknowledge how bad these movies have been, yet I&#039;m guilty of going back just to see how much worse it can get.  It makes me somewhat of a fan, and I&#039;m sure on down the lines the entire series will become a cult classic collective.

That being said, I got a serious kick out of this &quot;review&quot;, because it was spot-on.  Chances are, and with a free ticket just like with 4 and 5, I&#039;ll be seeing 6 pretty soon.  No matter how bad it looks, you just can&#039;t look away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; some of you guys need to find a grip and grab hold.</p>
<p>The Saw series undoubtedly turned into a train-wreck past the third one, and anyone with any thinking power would see that.  The fact that they were running out of ideas has been quite prevalent with all the back-pedalling and scooping up past characters, and it&#8217;s been like breathing air into lungs that had been sitting in formaldehyde for a few decades.  Not to mention all the hands in the pot, plus the very short time frames to write, shoot, edit and distribute, a successful film was beyond miraculous.</p>
<p>And yet, as much as we all have groaned after watching 4, we found ourselves coming back to 5, and more than likely 6.  If those of you criticizing the writer here would take a deep look inside yourselves, you&#8217;d probably agree and kick yourselves in the ass.</p>
<p>I personally acknowledge how bad these movies have been, yet I&#8217;m guilty of going back just to see how much worse it can get.  It makes me somewhat of a fan, and I&#8217;m sure on down the lines the entire series will become a cult classic collective.</p>
<p>That being said, I got a serious kick out of this &#8220;review&#8221;, because it was spot-on.  Chances are, and with a free ticket just like with 4 and 5, I&#8217;ll be seeing 6 pretty soon.  No matter how bad it looks, you just can&#8217;t look away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madman_Cropsy</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117707</link>
		<dc:creator>Madman_Cropsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117707</guid>
		<description>(Hey Loman, you&#039;re stupid)

((And why do you assume we drink cheap beer and smoke weed while masturbating to our mothers)) (((It sounds like you have some experience in that department)))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Hey Loman, you&#8217;re stupid)</p>
<p>((And why do you assume we drink cheap beer and smoke weed while masturbating to our mothers)) (((It sounds like you have some experience in that department)))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117578</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117578</guid>
		<description>hey loser...retarded doesn&#039;t mean stupid, it means slow.
calling a movie retarded demeans people with special needs and makes you look like a total tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey loser&#8230;retarded doesn&#8217;t mean stupid, it means slow.<br />
calling a movie retarded demeans people with special needs and makes you look like a total tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117501</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117501</guid>
		<description>This pseduo reviewer is a moron.  To take a shot at Muhammad Ali is just in poor taste.  I hope you are one day stricken with Parkinson&#039;s and are unable to talk or walk.  Hopefully for us, you will be unable to type as well.  You sir are a daft sod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This pseduo reviewer is a moron.  To take a shot at Muhammad Ali is just in poor taste.  I hope you are one day stricken with Parkinson&#8217;s and are unable to talk or walk.  Hopefully for us, you will be unable to type as well.  You sir are a daft sod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wil</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117460</link>
		<dc:creator>wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117460</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah and maybe you need to smoke a little pot, chill and look into getting a sense of humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah and maybe you need to smoke a little pot, chill and look into getting a sense of humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wil</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117459</link>
		<dc:creator>wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117459</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t trash someone&#039;s writing style with an annoying wall of text. 

1. There is nothing &quot;complex&quot; about the Saw films. If you believe that then you should quit trying to be internet scholars right now. Plus you are  doing a poor job of defending it with your comments. You can&#039;t defend the intelligence of the franchise with childish responses to a negative review. It just proves that the movies are not above Return of the Living Dead, and either are the fans. 

2. The one thing the Saw franchise does have is that it has not turned into a campy franchise, but it does suffer from the same thing most horror franchises suffer from; trying to paint itself out of a corner. I lost interest in the films a sequel ago because I got tired of watching them scramble to make something out of a concept that should have stopped with the first film. 

I have not seen the latest Saw movie and I have read that this one did a good job of turning the franchise around, but it is probably too late. It has already lost too many fans on the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t trash someone&#8217;s writing style with an annoying wall of text. </p>
<p>1. There is nothing &#8220;complex&#8221; about the Saw films. If you believe that then you should quit trying to be internet scholars right now. Plus you are  doing a poor job of defending it with your comments. You can&#8217;t defend the intelligence of the franchise with childish responses to a negative review. It just proves that the movies are not above Return of the Living Dead, and either are the fans. </p>
<p>2. The one thing the Saw franchise does have is that it has not turned into a campy franchise, but it does suffer from the same thing most horror franchises suffer from; trying to paint itself out of a corner. I lost interest in the films a sequel ago because I got tired of watching them scramble to make something out of a concept that should have stopped with the first film. </p>
<p>I have not seen the latest Saw movie and I have read that this one did a good job of turning the franchise around, but it is probably too late. It has already lost too many fans on the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOMAN</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117458</link>
		<dc:creator>LOMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117458</guid>
		<description>You need to worry less about titties on the screen (I can just imagine you with a hand in your pants and your mind on your mother) (you see how stupid this parentheses thing looks) (and how dumb it makes you seem) (anyways) and more about what a real horror franchise is. The SAW movies remain among the best that the horror genre has ever offered due totally to their lack of humor (which I know will will say is present in full amounts in spite of itself) (but (once again) your wrong!) (how about that...parentheses within parentheses) and their engaging and thought provoking plot lines (I actually want to watch these movie as soon as I&#039;ve seen &#039;em for the first time) (most horror movies just make me wanna poop). Shit horror movies like &quot;The Return of the Living Dead&quot; are what gives horror fans (fans of true horror) the smoked up, too high to watch anything that makes you think and anything with a plot line, drunken, tittie crazed image that exsists....I think you don&#039;t like the films because you are too stoned to understand the plot line...let alone what a plot line is. SAW is one of the only franchises to keep more than one character and one plot line going through every film. Most just take the one monster or general premise and take it into the future or to the past or through a totally different cast (which is why most horror franchises blow!) Again - stop smoking weed (for at least an hour), get your mind off of your Moms tits (the ones on the screen will never compare to hers...I know...I&#039;ve seen &#039;em...but, who hasn&#039;t), set down the plastic cup filled with cheap tastless beer and watch all 6 films again. Maybe your little brain will understand the concept behind the story (probably not).
I hope I have met my &quot;douche-bag does parentheses&quot; quota for the month...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to worry less about titties on the screen (I can just imagine you with a hand in your pants and your mind on your mother) (you see how stupid this parentheses thing looks) (and how dumb it makes you seem) (anyways) and more about what a real horror franchise is. The SAW movies remain among the best that the horror genre has ever offered due totally to their lack of humor (which I know will will say is present in full amounts in spite of itself) (but (once again) your wrong!) (how about that&#8230;parentheses within parentheses) and their engaging and thought provoking plot lines (I actually want to watch these movie as soon as I&#8217;ve seen &#8216;em for the first time) (most horror movies just make me wanna poop). Shit horror movies like &#8220;The Return of the Living Dead&#8221; are what gives horror fans (fans of true horror) the smoked up, too high to watch anything that makes you think and anything with a plot line, drunken, tittie crazed image that exsists&#8230;.I think you don&#8217;t like the films because you are too stoned to understand the plot line&#8230;let alone what a plot line is. SAW is one of the only franchises to keep more than one character and one plot line going through every film. Most just take the one monster or general premise and take it into the future or to the past or through a totally different cast (which is why most horror franchises blow!) Again &#8211; stop smoking weed (for at least an hour), get your mind off of your Moms tits (the ones on the screen will never compare to hers&#8230;I know&#8230;I&#8217;ve seen &#8216;em&#8230;but, who hasn&#8217;t), set down the plastic cup filled with cheap tastless beer and watch all 6 films again. Maybe your little brain will understand the concept behind the story (probably not).<br />
I hope I have met my &#8220;douche-bag does parentheses&#8221; quota for the month&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maedman_Cropsy</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117449</link>
		<dc:creator>Maedman_Cropsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117449</guid>
		<description>Saw sucks. You guys are pussy&#039;s.

they are some of the best and most complex movies that I have ever seen

LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw sucks. You guys are pussy&#8217;s.</p>
<p>they are some of the best and most complex movies that I have ever seen</p>
<p>LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117445</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117445</guid>
		<description>You are a complete and total piece of crap you know absolutly nothing about the saw franchise they are some of the best and most complex movies that I have ever seen.....I dont hear you bashing the freddy or jason movies there has to be at least like ten of each of them and they dont even have a F**KING storyline....if you dont like the saw movies get the F**K over it nobody wants to hear your BULLS**t!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a complete and total piece of crap you know absolutly nothing about the saw franchise they are some of the best and most complex movies that I have ever seen&#8230;..I dont hear you bashing the freddy or jason movies there has to be at least like ten of each of them and they dont even have a F**KING storyline&#8230;.if you dont like the saw movies get the F**K over it nobody wants to hear your BULLS**t!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117443</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117443</guid>
		<description>You really are a horrible person. This is probably the worst review that I have ever read. Go F**K yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really are a horrible person. This is probably the worst review that I have ever read. Go F**K yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdog</title>
		<link>http://www.horroryearbook.com/546748/saw-vi-review/comment-page-1#comment-117439</link>
		<dc:creator>jdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horroryearbook.com/?p=6748#comment-117439</guid>
		<description>ur a doushemuffin buddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ur a doushemuffin buddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

